Far From You is one of those books that kind of seeps in around the edges until you’ve been completely caught up in it without realizing. Though not perfect, it’s a solid book and the lacking bits probably wouldn’t have seemed as lacking if they weren’t juxtaposed by such brilliant bits. It’s haunting and powerful in a way that’s stayed with me since I closed it.
Let’s get the unpleasant out of the way first.
Things I Didn’t Like:
I understand the inclusion of the whole murder mystery aspect, it gave the plot an arc and the story momentum. For most of the book it was an interesting addition, though it definitely took a backseat to the brilliant character parts. However, when the end came and you found out whodunit, it felt so flat. Like, okay, really? That person? For those reasons? It technically wasn’t totally out of the blue, but it definitely felt that way. It was sort of like you’ve been going along enjoying the A and B plots and when they were coming to a close, they handed the reins over to the C and D plots to finish out the book.
The story is told in dual timeline, each present day chapter is interspersed with a chapter from Sophie’s past, usually centered around Mina and adding context to the present day events of the book. So far, so good, right? The part that got a little weird is how non-linear the flashbacks were. I can’t say it was ultimately a bad thing, it didn’t take away from my enjoyment of the book and who knows, maybe if they’d been told in linear time, the characters wouldn’t have felt as rich and the interactions wouldn’t have held as much meaning. However, while I was reading, I kept getting distracted trying to figure out what the significance of seeing this memory at this moment was. Sometimes the memory situations would end on a semi-cliffhanger and then it would be several chapters before we got back to what happened next, which was occasionally frustrating.
Things I liked:
The writing is lovely. It’s somehow both matter-of-fact and still secretive. It has this way of luring you in and lulling you before knocking the wind out of you, throwing out heart-wrenchingly evocative lines like this:
I wish [Mina’s death] had been like that. Almost as much as I wish it had been over instantly, so she wouldn’t have been so scared. I wish that any part of it could have been peaceful or quiet or brave. Anything but the painful, frantic mess we became in the dirt, all breath and blood and fear.
The strength of Far From You lies in it’s characters and their relationships to each other. Sophie, Mina and Trev are caught up in one of the most interesting and tragic love triangles I have ever read and it’s made all the more complicated when you consider two of them are related and one of them is dead.
You may have noticed that I used the dreaded ‘love triangle’ and you may be confused by it’s placement under the ‘Things I Liked’ header. That’s right, I loved this love triangle. I think the problem with most love triangles is that they’re often used as a sort of highly romanticized cheat code to bypass actually having a plot, not so much here. Basically, Trev loves Sophie and Sophie loves Trev but she loves his sister Mina more than anything and then Mina loves/loved (that dual timeline comes into play here) both of them but is scared of what that means and also can see how Sophie and Trev would make a lovely, easy couple (did you follow that?). It’s messy and painful, balanced on a knife’s edge where a step in the wrong direction will result in broken hearts and obliterated relationships both before and after murder comes into the equation.
I particularly loved the larger-than-life Mina. It’s impressive when the character that initially jumps out at you the most is the dead one. As with many loved and lost characters, Sophie initially presents/remembers Mina in her brightest light. Mina was fun, sassy and brave. Mina went after what she wanted, looked out for those she loved and generally made life so magical and amazing that losing her, especially in such a brutal fashion, has had an effect on her friends and family similar to that of dropping a grenade (i.e. carnage and devastation in every direction). However, over the course of the book you come to realize that Mina was just as flawed and scared as the rest of us, she just hid it behind a dazzling display of herself. Getting to know the characters and learning their secrets was hands down my favorite part of the book.
I also appreciate how Far From You portrays addiction. On the surface when you have an addictive substance and an addict it’s easy to assume that one feeds the other and it’s a neatly closed cycle, not worth thinking too deeply about. You kick the addiction and presto! You’re an addict in recovery, as long as you stay clean it’s all good right? No. Wrong. The thing about addiction is it’s a mindset, a wiring of your brain that leaves you unable to control yourself and act rationally in the face of your addiction and this book gets that. Yes, Sophie is addicted to Oxy (or oxycodone, a narcotic painkiller often compared to heroin in terms of addictiveness), but before Sophie was addicted to the pills, she was addicted to Mina and without both she’s addicted to resolving Mina’s murder. Kicking the drug isn’t the same as kicking the mental pattern and Sophie is just starting to realize she’s eventually going to have to face that. It’s all built up to in such a wonderfully subtle way that until the last few chapters, I really thought I was reading too much into Sophie. It’s smoothly shown, not told, in a way that left me infinitely more satisfied than I would’ve been if it’d all been presented up front.
Final Verdict:
I loved Far From You. It’s strengths more than make up for its weaknesses. It’s a beautiful, angsty, insightful look into several very real issues. It’s a shame that the mystery fell so flat for me, but I can tell you that, after reading it several days ago, the bad stuff has fallen away while the good stuff lingers on.
P.E. @ The Sirenic Codex
Sounds incredible! I’m definitely looking forward to reading it. Now I’m really curious about the characters and their relationships, especially Mina. It seems like she goes through a lot of character development, even if she is dead, and I think that will be fun to read about. Great review!
Meg Morley
It’s fantastic! A definite win for a character-driven reader.
Missie
I am a little sad about the mystery part falling short, but I am excited to read this one!
Missie @ A Flurry of Ponderings
Meg Morley
I advise you to not think of it as a mystery as much as a moving contemporary about love and grief with a minor mysterious side note. I hope you love it!
Sam @ Realm of Fiction
I agree so much! I felt the same way about the big reveal towards the end. It did seem quite random to me – unpredictable, but not impressive. However, I really liked the book overall. Mina’s character particularly stood out to me, and like you said, it’s incredible when the author can do that to a character that is dead throughout the story. The romance didn’t really feel like much of a triangle to me, but I liked how authentic and real it was. I was definitely pleasantly surprised by the emotional aspect of the story, even if the mystery was as strong as it could have been. 🙂 Lovely review, Meg!
Meg Morley
Thank you! I’m glad you liked it. The reveal was so random, such an eleventh hour plot point. I debated for awhile over whether or not to call the love story a triangle because you’re right, it completely does not feel like one. However, the three of them are so deeply tangled in each other’s lives and the outcome of their situation that I don’t think it’s necessarily inappropriate.
Angel (Spare Reads)
Oh man I’m SUPER excited about this one! The synopsis drew me in and it’s just impossible to walk away afterwards. When the review first started coming in, I was a bit worried. But then everyone was saying how great the story was and I just knew I had to own it! The relationships between Sophie, Trev, and Mina sound fascinating and I can’t wait to find out more! Thanks for the review Meg 🙂
Dahlia Adler
Love love love this review so much – it’s all my thoughts exactly, and I recommend it so, so highly.
Brittany @ This is the Story of My(Reading) Life
Still have me intrigued! 🙂
Christina (A Reader of Fictions)
“For most of the book it was an interesting addition” <- Yes. I was curious and entertained by it, but then at the end I was like REALLY? All condescending like. I felt similar about Don't Look Back. And these are the mystery novels I like. Sometimes it seems like to get the shocking twist, they sacrifice logic. Or, in the case of Faking Normal, straight up lie to the reader. I wonder what you'd think of that one.
I didn't mind the time-jumping. I'm okay with that technique as long as I don't end up confused.
The love triangle could have been so melodrama, but wasn't, which I appreciate. And she was so logical about it all.
The portrayal of addiction may have been my favorite part. I thought it was great that Sharpe showed addiction to a medicine, not recreational drugs. And the fact that it was so hard for her to kick, and something she has to live with constantly.
*high fives* I love when we agree on things.