Buzz Worthy News: 21 January 2012

21 January, 2013 Buzz Worthy News 21 comments

BWNBuzz Worthy News

This is it or isn’t it discussion over piracy continues this week, breaking news on Sylvia Plath and her relationship with her mother, Marvel is down with the ladies, a poetry competition winner was outed this week for plagiarism, and the drama in the book blogging community is getting back into full swing.  Come check out all this and more in this week’s Buzz Worthy News.

Buzz Worthy News is Cuddlebuggery’s weekly news post bringing you all the best information about the book and blogging world, particularly for the venn diagram of people who overlap between the two.  For new releases and cover reveals of all the best Young Adult fiction, check out our Sunday post: How New Titles.


PiracyPiracy – Good? Bad? At least there’s Rum?

So everyone has an opinion on Piracy.  Good, bad, indifferent, the only way some people access content.

Another voice adds to the deluge of opinion over whether piracy is good or bad or will feed your pet while your overseas and drink all your rum (No to feeding pet, yes to drinking all the rum).

In a presentation at the Digital Book World Conference in New York today, Smith argued against three myths that he said permeate the discussion on illegal downloading. The first is that piracy doesn’t harm sales, which he said is not true. “Piracy harms sales,” he said, claiming that while 3 studies have been published suggesting that piracy doesn’t hurt sales, 25 others have shown that piracy is bad for sales. ”There are options to use legitimate distribution channels to convince people who have stolen your content to buy it,” he added.

See, folks?  This is the problem with stupid stuff like studies and science!  One study says one thing, five others say a different thing. Way to be confusing, science!

Then Michael Smith argued that not having digital content available makes people more likely to pirate.

“When people couldn’t find it in iTunes anymore they went to piracy,” concluded Smith. (During this time DVD sales remained steady.) Piracy increased 11 percent for NBC titles and ABC, CBS and FOX, also saw increases in their content being pirated. “There was also a negative spillover effect for the industry because people learned how to pirate,” explained Smith.

Captain Obvious concluded his speech by proclaiming that it’s rude to kick puppies and that stealing candy from babies is socially unpopular.


U1889231Sylvia Plath hid stuff from her mom.  Cigarettes.  Bad boyfriend.  The Bell Jar.

Plath committed suicide in 1963, but her life, her death and the messy issue of the hesitance issues that followed.

Some of her old friends have come forward to criticize – a little more – her ex-husband and her publisher over their actions after her death.

Sylvia Plath would never have wanted her semi-autobiographical novel The Bell Jar published under her name while her mother, Aurelia Plath, was still alive, one of the writer’s friends has said.

Elizabeth Sigmund, one of Plath’s closest confidants, also accused the writer’s former husband, Ted Hughes, and his sister, Olwyn Hughes, of deliberately missing the dedication to her from the first edition which was published under Plath’s own name, in 1966, “because they didn’t want anyone who knew Sylvia to have any contact with the press”.

Long story short, because bickering between people of Plath’s estate always turns into a long, petty story, the publisher denies any wrong doing.  Ted and Olwyn gave them permission, isn’t the Bell Jar great, blah, blah, blah.

Sigmund said in an interview with the Guardian: “There are two sides to this, of course. Because it was a brilliant book, one is glad that it was credited to her. But also you have to regard her wishes. If she said she didn’t want to hurt people’s feelings, by having it published under her own name … I certainly think that Ted and Olwyn should have mentioned that. And then Faber would have had to make up their minds. But for Monteith to say that he’d certainly never heard that – it just seems that they were keeping it from Faber.”

Basically, other people weigh in and, long story short, everyone is horrible.

He said there was “no love lost” between Plath and Olwyn Hughes, a view also held by Sigmund, who claims that “Olwyn hated her”.

Olwyn Hughes admitted she thought Plath was “a monster”. Yet she also expressed sympathy for the author.

“She was a very agonised lady. She had to battle to live every day – as you might think from The Bell Jar. When I read it after she died, I just wept.”

On the matter of using Plath’s own name on the book, she denied this was controversial. “What people want after they’re dead. That just goes.”

Yes.  As soon as a person is dead, it’s totally cool to disregard all their wishes, desires and do stuff that will certainly cause extra harm to the vulnerable people left behind.  Awesome.


need a new idea1When you need pole dancing to encourage library attendance – the battle is already lost

So you’re a library and you want to increase attendance and borrowing by your local community – what do you do?  How can you be fresh and new and different?

Well, you could try and think up ways to increase community awareness and participation by activities that involve reading, book discussion and recommendation.  Or you could do what Midlothian does and just hold pole dancing classes.  And as bad as that idea is – they actually managed to come up with a worse one.  I mean, pole dancing classes are bad because it has nothing to do with reading and seems designed entirely for shock value.  But Book Pong is even worse.  Using books as pong paddles?  Seriously?! How does this encourage reading?  How is that even fun?  WHO THOUGHT OF THESE IDEAS AND WHY DO THEY STILL HAVE A JOB?!

I mean seriously, on a scale of 1-10 for blatant misuse of a library for reasons that are inexplicable to any normal person, this rates a bit ol’ 10-point-wtfwereyoudrunk?!

“The pole fitness session is a fun and interesting way of encouraging more people into our libraries, trying out all the services on offer and ultimately borrowing more books.

“But it’s not just pole fitness on offer. I’m delighted to see such a wide range of free and exciting events organised to mark this special occasion.”

The pole dancing class, for over-16s only, will take place between 1.30pm and 3pm.”

OH!  So it’s only for over 16’s only – well, that’s completely ok- no.  It’s not.  May your crotch itch with the fury of a thousand louse.


XXmen-men- you mean, X-WOMEN!?

Out in April, the first issue in the new X-Men series from writer Brian Wood steers clear of any male team members, instead focusing on female characters including Storm, Psylocke, Jubilee, Kitty Pryde, Rachel Grey and Rogue. The superheroes chosen for the series are a “plethora of greats” and an “iconic and dynamic cast”, according to publisher Marvel, which specified the characters to be included in the book.

You know, I’m not saying this is a bad idea, okay?  I love it.  I already checked the Marvel App to see if I could preorder it yet (alas no! But I did buy six issues of Sigil.  Anyone know if this is any good?) After all, I’m ignoring the fact that many books have an almost entirely male cast (like Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit) and this mostly isn’t even questioned let alone considered out of the usual.  B-but, just make it good, okay guys?

You’re already kind of worrying me when you write things like: “but added that “a sceptic might point out that this would have been a great opportunity to hand a big franchise to a female creator, grumble grumble”. The comics industry has come under fire in the past for its perceived lack of female characters and authors, with Marvel’s rival DC Comics the subject of a petition in 2011 over the limited number of women it employs.”

I mean, yes – it would have.  And if we grumble, it’s because we care and we’re sick of being invisible/existing mostly for titillation in the comic book world.  And “perceived lack of female characters and authors”? Okay, this isn’t a problem of perception, okay?  Our eyesight and ability to cognitively process images is just fine.  There IS a lack of female characters and authors in the comic book industry and the artistic depiction/backstories and representation of existing female characters tends to be problematic.

Look, I want this to succeed.  I want this to be epic.  So, Marvel, please don’t fuck this up, okay?  You’re years ahead of DC.  Don’t just make this a cheap, half-arsed gimmick where the characters are two-dimensional sex-objects whose main job it is to look pretty.  I’m begging you.  Out of Wood, Copiel and Martin, Martin is the only woman billed on the project – though Wood claims to have a strong history writing female characters in comic books.  Based on the teaser cover, I’m already feeling extremely apprehensive.


PlagiarizePoetry winner is a fraud.  Prepare for a well-deserved hate-on!

So Christian Ward won a poetry competition.  Awesome.  How totally cool is it to win a poetry competition?  I want to win one!  Here – I have a poem.

Dude, win me this competition.

Otherwise I will make a petition

to get your ass beat.

Hahahahahah, funkyjizzprick!

The poet Christian Ward has said that he had “no intention of deliberately plagiarising” the work of another writer after it was discovered that his prize-winning entry to a poetry competition was lifted “almost word-for-word” from a poem by Helen Mort.

Question: How do you almost word-for-word write the same poem as someone else?  I mean, did he slip and press the ctrl-c, ctrl-p key and then sneeze extra hard when he accidentally submitted that to a competition?  Then, like, forget to mention it to anyone until it gets brought up?  DUDE! He, of course, Mansplains so that all us stupid people can understand how innocent he is:

“Working on a poem about my childhood experiences in Exmoor and was careless”, and that he “used Helen Mort’s poem as a model for my own but rushed and ended up submitting a draft that wasn’t entirely my own work”.”I had no intention of deliberately plagiarising her work. That is the truth,”

Happens, to me all the time.  Here’s another poem I wrote the other day by bashing my head on the keyboard while screaming “I love cheese” over and over again:

“Pretty women wonder where my secret lies.
I’m not cute or built to suit a fashion model’s size
But when I start to tell them,
They think I’m telling lies.

Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly I wished the morrow; – vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow – sorrow for the lost Lenore –
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore –
Nameless here for evermore.

About three things I was absolutely positive. First, Edward was a vampire. Second, there was part of him — and I didn’t know how potent that part might be — that thirsted for my blood. And third, I was unconditionally and irrevocably in love with him.

So, Christian Wood, even though Helen Mort did all the hard work and wrote a kickass poem worthy of winning a competition, I totally understand how you could accidentally submit her poem as your own.  I believe you.  It was a total accident.  Could happen to ANYONE.



Do Not Read? More like: Do Not Exist, Please!

Okay, so Do Not Read lists have been a discussion point in the Goodreads/Book Blogging world this past year.  But you know something’s gone mainstream when Jimmy Fallon brings it up!  So, I present to you a video of his Do Not Read list.  I honestly wish I could describe it to you, but it doesn’t allow Australian viewers to watch it… I’m going to blame Rupert Murdoch here because shit like this is usually his fault.  Please feel free to tell me if this video is amazing and I’m truly missing out.

What books are on this list?  I don’t know!  I can’t report on this because I can’t view it.  Does this seem unfair to anyone else?  Cause it’s complete bullshit to me!

What’s on your Do Not Read List?  For me, personally, it’s anything with a cover like this:

tumblr_mdjinkXWxL1r4dtnao1_500Hahahaha!  Sorry, joke from the last BWN!


Stephanie Meyer is Producing Anna Dressed in Blood

Okay, so it’s no secret that Cuddlebuggery Book Blog adores Kendare Blake with the passion of a thousand suns.  We worship her as the brilliant, shining, brilliant light of authorly brilliance that she is.  So, imagine our excitement when we heard that Anna Dressed in Blood was being made into a movie?  We danced, we celebrated, we worshiped at the bubble-gum altar of Blake that we keep in our closet a la Hey Arnold!

hey arnold

So imagine our horror and shock when we saw that Stephanie Meyer was producing Anna Dressed in Blood.  No!  What?  Why?! The Book that I loved and Stephanie was famously meh about?!  NNOOOOO.  We love Blake too much to let this happen!

Meyer and her producing partner at company Fickle Fish have optioned the book’s rights and begun developing the film, with Meyer set to produce (but probably not write), according to a person familiar with the project who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak about it publicly.

What???!!!  Okay, you know what?  In exchange for getting an Anna Dressed in Blood movie, I don’t care if Beelzebub himself is producing it.  As long as someone decent writes the script, I need it, okay?  I need this NAOW.


JimJim C Hines keeps being awesome.  You do that, brah!

You know, I never really read a book by Jim C Hines, not that I wouldn’t like to, but I love his cover work.  Which he has done for a while now, where he poses as women on the covers of books.  And it’s fantastic because, like the Hawkeye Initiative, it makes fun of the popularist and horrible ways women are depicted on book covers.  But this week Jim C Hines hooked up with several other sci-fi authors to do a pretty impressive cover shoot!

Flandry Side by Side

In case you’re wondering – that is, from left to right, up to down, John Scalzi, Mary Robinette Cowal (Robinette is possibly the coolest middle name ever), Patrick Rothfuss and Charles Stross. And it is hilarious.  Reverse the genders and all the sudden, something that looks so normative becomes ridiculous.  I couldn’t think of a better way of highlighting gender inequality in fiction than this!

So, basically, keeping being awesome, Jim C. Hines!  And I will keep loving you – and eventually read one of your books!

Also, Jim C Hines’ antics made it into the Guardian, peeps!  Celebrate!



Plagiarism: Nobody’s Fault, a Victimless Crime *Insert 90’s “not!”*

So, earlier in this Week’s BWN we showed how Wood admitted to accidentally copying another poet’s work – cause that’s totally something that’s easy to do, and what does it matter any way, right?  In the age of easy internet sharing when stuff gets recycled, tumblred, shared and the watermarks for the original artist removed, this is nothing new.  Unfortunately, Sparkles and Lightning Blog recently went through this and they’ve posted their latest debacle this week.

Up-To-Date Reviewing has stolen content from at least six blogs at last count, and I’m not sure what the count is up to now. They obviously thought they wouldn’t get caught, or they wouldn’t have done it. But if there’s one thing I know it’s that you can’t hide forever. When you make your bed, you gotta lay in it.

Once we discovered this, it seemed like all hopes of resolving this privately were lost. Up-To-Date Reviewing began to remove all the plagiarized content from their blog, but they did not contact or apologize to the owners of the blogs they stole from. They were clearly trying to sweep it under the rug and pretend it never happened. And that is absolutely not okay. They made their decision when they plagiarized and they have to deal with the consequences.

They go on to present their email exchanges with Up To Date Reviewing, which is really depressing and disheartening.  It just goes to show that being plagiarized from is really blood depressing and horrible.  We wouldn’t know, because Steph and I have never been plagiarized (that we know of), but we’re damn sure glad of that!  Because we can only be glad of that.

Look, plagiarism is horrible.  Take it seriously, dudes. The effects, the victims and how it absolutely doesn’t even phase those who profit from it.


Authors and Negative Reviews – Just Fucking Deal With Them, Okay?

My Paranormal Book Reviews posted a really depressing recap of their communication with an author this week.  Basically, this is what happened:

…so I recently (very recently) read a self published story that I really found a lot of problems with. I rated the book two stars and wrote a negative review. I pointed out what I felt to be really off with the story, and yes, I was sarcastic in my review because I was just dumbfounded by the story. You can read my review here.

Of course every author thinks they have a five star book, otherwise what would be the point of publishing it? Some authors take criticism better than others. This particular author felt the need to defend her writing. She felt my review was “mean spirited” and an “unfair assessment” of her writing. She went on to imply I either had a “bad day” or an “agenda”. Really?

Basically, the interaction gets more ridiculous as it progresses.  But, most annoying, is the insinuation that a normal response to a book not liked, is a non-review.

I guess it certainly serves me right asking for assistance in my email that if you enjoyed the book, if could you help me out by letting others know about it.  Figured if you did not like it and couldn’t in good conscience offer any assistance, you’d just do nothing or decline privately.   ** hits self in head **  Thanks.

Whether it’s the mistaken assumption that it should be assumed bloggers would only provide positive reviews, or the fact that this author is so ungrateful to receiving a review at all, that annoys me most.  Point of fact: We are not a free publicity service.  Because you created a product, because you’re passionate about it, does not entitle you to have your feeling cared about by all your consumers.  Are we to assume that musicians and inventors and programmers don’t care, or are not passionate about their products?

Anyway, read the entire entry here for more details!

Drama, drama, drama.

So, this author that almost everyone on the planet as never heard of, posted about how wonderful STRGB was because they stuck up for her against negative reviews.

Recently I have been the victim of bullies on a reader’s site called Goodreads. At first, I was deflated and even cried over it, sad to say. However, I decided to look into this matter further in order NOT to be a victim again! This is what I found…Apparently, there are quite a few people on this site who have attacked other new authors such as me. It is nice to know you are not alone when the chips are down and even more wonderful to see people defend you. It lends credit to the valid fact of the reality of this attack. It is tough enough following your dreams out there in any pursuit, but to have bored and vindictive people prey on you is appalling and pathetic. This same group has even discouraged writers from not only the site out of the pain inflicted-but even one author is not writing anymore!

Fact #1: People aren’t bored enough to hate on your book for fun.  It’s nice to imagine those negative reviews are just from biased haters. But this is a pipe dream that benefits no one.

As one commenter said:

You’re barely a blip on anyone’s radar. You don’t have more than twenty ratings or reviews on any of your books. I have more ratings and reviews on one short story than you do on all of your novels combined. I really think you need to put up your big girl panties and suck it up. Being a writer is hard. You will be criticized. Get over it.

Hard to believe: that people legitimately dislike your book, believe it is of lesser quality, have honestly given it one star.

Easier to believe: that they’re just horrible, bored haters who are picking on your for fun for no other reason other than that they are shitheads.

Unfortunately, for many authors, people have better things to do with their time than to hate on unknown authors for fun.

Fact #2: Public opinion is cruel. Arguing against it and requesting every random reviewer be kind and take your emotional state/kindness into consideration is like Caligula waging war against the ocean – crazy and impossible.  People will review how they honestly feel.  This isn’t bullying, this is opinion because they are consumers and you are the pusher of a product.

Fact 3: If you support STGRB then no one will take you seriously.  Ever.

No need to elaborate on this.  Enjoy the bullshit-factory while it still works for you.

Fact 4: The author you’re referring to, that quit writing, did not quit writing because of Goodreads. This it her blogpost on why she quit writing so that you can see why she really quit and why even she doesn’t support STRBG:

Goodreads-Cyn Balog's BlogSo, yeah, that is that. The world is a harsh place, no matter how many times you insist that you are a good person and don’t deserve people being mean about your book.

Another author responds to this author’s post and private communication.


Kat Kennedy

Kat Kennedy

Co-blogger at Cuddlebuggery
Kat Kennedy is a book reviewer and aspiring author in the Young Adult genre. She reviews critically but humorously and get super excited about great books. Find her on GoodReads.
Kat Kennedy

21 Responses to “Buzz Worthy News: 21 January 2012”

  1. Lexxie

    *sigh* I was hoping 2013 was going to be a calmer year with no more authors berating reviewers for their opinions… it always makes me really sad to read stuff about authors taking it on themselves to get reviewers to change their minds.
    Yeah, mistakingly plagiarizing a whole peom is really, really plausible. And to enter it into a competition is really stupid!
    I don’t know what’s up with book-bloggers stealing content from other bloggers either. That is <b>so</b> low. We all know how much time it takes to write a review, and for someone to just grab it and post it as their own is not only mean, but lazy and stupid as well.
    I’m wondering if I should try to get my oldest daughter into the comics busines… she’d have some kick-ass heroines for sure. it’s always seemed so strange to me that the comics industry thinks that girls and women aren’t interested, and that we love to see huge boobs and never-ending legs on scantily clad women when we grab a comic.
    I loved the reversed gender picture! LOL just excellent!
    And as always, great buzz-worthy news post 🙂 thank you!

  2. Fangs4Fantasy

    On pole dancing – if someone’s pole dancing and the
    people around are READING then that is a) a very bad pole dancer and b) a
    really cruel hit to said pole dancer’s self-esteem.
     I love the “perception” excuse. The perception is there’s
    a lack of female writers. Because there’s loads of invisible female writers you
    just haven’t seen, right? I know! Female Author Ninjas! See, the male writer
    leaves his computer to go to the bathroom and returns to an odd silence,
    shadowy figures moving out of the corner of his eye – and chapters of text on
    his computer he didn’t see before. The Female Author Ninjas have struck again!
    Imperceptible to the eye!
     And how does one accidentally plagiarise something? Do
    you get possessed by the words? Do you let your attention wander and then OOPS
     More to the point, with the internet being what it is,
    how do these people think they’re going to get away with it? Or that you can
    just make it go away with some deletes. The internet doesn’t work that way. Nor
    does “who cares, it doesn’t matter” uh-huh – people care. Hence the anger every
    time it’s revealed
    And your reaction to Anna dressed in blood and stephenie Meyer is akin to mine
    when I learned Kim Harrison’s Hollows series was getting a TV series – on the

  3. Fangs4Fantasy

    Oh we’re not STILL on the “waaah bad reviews means you
    hates me hates me precious!” kick? Honestly – anything I buy, ANYTHING – be it
    a toaster, a loaf of bread, ablock of
    cheese (hmmm.. I fancy cheese on toast) I have an opinion on it. I don’t get
    toaster makers wailing at me because I’m tired of their damn useless machine
    only having 2 settings (“frozen” and “cremated to ash by the very core of the
    sun itself”). You sell a product, your customers have opinions, reviewers
    express those opinions. And sometimes they’re not very nice about the time and
    money they’ve invested in what turns out to be a big pile of steaming elephant
     We’ve also had authors pull the “only post a review if it’s
    positive” and I say very clearly – screw that. I – and I imagine every book
    blogger out there – as a To Be Read Pile that numbers in the dozens if not
    hundreds, all there screaming “why don’t you reaaaaaad me?! WHYYYYY?! No SLEEP
    READ! READ!” You don’t, in those circumstances, invest hours reading a book you
    can’t review – especially if you don’t even like it! And a reviewer who sends
    their criticism privately? Oh sorry, you’ve mistaken me for a beta-reader or
    And the first thing I do when I find a book reviewer is look for their negative
    reviews. If they can’t say anything except “oh it’s covered in gold scattered
    in diamonds and smells of unicorn farts” I avoid – if a reviewer can’t be
    relied on to call crap crap, then how can rely on them to call gold gold?
     This whole “you have an agenda” or “you hate this book
    for fun?” Or “deliberately reading it wrong” (how do we even do that?!)  or “looking to be offended”. Ugh. Oh please, like we have that kind of time! And it’s always the most
    obscure, unknown author ever who seems to think complete strangers have the
    time and energy to hunt them down with their pernicious “agenda.” You aren’t that
    important, hon. 
    (Excuse spammage but this crap gets on my very last nerve)

  4. Jennifer @ The Bawdy Book Blog

    I had an author ask me for a review last year and I accepted.  He then sent me the book, and then added the caveat to only post the review if it was going to be positive, because after all, he was “sending a free book” to me *wink*.  I was like, fuck you dude, that’s not why I do this.  And then I deleted the email (and ebook) completely.  

    And then STGRB likes to turn bad reviews around on their head like bloggers have a personal vendetta against someone we’ve never met.  *finger*  And well… know how I feel about that.  I can already feel myself frothing at the mouth.

  5. Ashleigh Paige

    I kind of love Jim C. Hines even though I’ve never read any of his books. All his poses are fantastic and I hope he hasn’t screwed up his back like I’m sure many of those models have.
    I still count myself lucky I’ve never had an author come to me complaining about the negative review I gave their book. They’ll complain about the shelf if I put them on my Do Not Read shelf on occasion (like the thing with Nadege that still makes me steam), but nothing yet from authors I’ve actually reviewed. That’s probably because I rarely accept books from authors. I don’t count the author who asked me to remove a major spoiler I stupidly wrote into my review. I was perfectly fine with that.

    -sigh- Effing plagiarists. I’d bonk all their heads together if I could.

  6. nrlymrtl

    Jim Hines is the BOMB! I totally want him. Well, I want to read his books, and Mary Cowal’s, Rothfuss’, Stross’, and Scalzi’s. But I will bypass BAEN books for now. And what is up with that cover for the lady Xmen? Come on! I want women in body armor, weaponed up, and some eye candy for us ladies (like a few well-muscled but helpless males in need of rescuing). Put that on the cover, and you have my money and eternal worship. I am a book blogger/reviewer and I am honest but not cruel in my reviews. If I did not enjoy a book, I will still weigh in the crafting of the piece. If you’re a decent writer, your book still stands a chance of getting 3 stars because you have honed your craft. But if you have plot inconsistencies, decided to forgo spellcheck, or misspell your characters names repeatedly through out the book, don’t blame the reviewer for a low rating.
    Oh, and I wouldn’t mind taking a pole dancing class, but if it’s held at the library I’m going to be way to distracted by the books 😉

  7. FMMFC

    I saw this exchange last week and wrote a blog post about it even though I usually ignore this stuff. The book actually sounded interesting to me (she had me at cannibalism)  but this behavior is exhausting. 
     To all the soft hided authors out there I quote thee fabulous Clive Barker:
    ““No tears, please.  It’s a waste of good suffering.”

  8. Arabella Caulfield

    Oh. That Poul Anderson cover is a shame – I couldn’t even imagine it may come to THIS! You know, I simply LOVED his Time Patrol stories at high school – even though they were still a bit shocking to me at times. One can learn how to create a badass female protagonist by just looking at Wanda Tamberly. Oddly enough, today I’ve been thinking of Anderson and the Time Patrol almost all day long. Then, I visit your blog and see THIS. Although I’ve never had the chance to read the Flandry series, I’m shocked. Simply shocked. Is this how they treat classics nowadays? And well, sorry for my appalling English. Greetings from Ukraine!

  9. Kate C.

    As usual, I want to comment on EVERYTHING.  🙂
    I don’t know why people feel the need to write about piracy over and over and over again.  It’s already been said, pple.  Move on!
    Funny thing.  Our library provides books and that seems to be good enough in our town.  *shrugs*  Okay, they also have internet access, literacy programs, children’s groups, and various other programs, but overall, it’s just books.
    Hey, at least the women on the cover of the new X-Men have CLOTHING on.  I mean, they look like they could actually fight someone and kick some butt in clothes like that.  (except for storm’s massive cleavage, of course).
    Patrick Rothfuss made me laugh so hard I almost peed my pants with his pose on that cover.  That is pretty much the coolest thing I’ve ever seen and tip of the hat to Cline for pointing out the double standards, because honestly I’m sick of it.  (As a long time Sci-fi reader, I’ve seen plenty of those kinds of covers).
    Plagiarism is pretty much every author’s worst nightmare.  The kindleboards are filled with stories of authors who have had their stories, their covers and their names taken from them by others.  One person had the author’s exact cover and book for sale, diverting the original author’s true audience to their own fake account.  It was awful!  I feel so bad for those involved.
    Finally, authors, I recommend that you divorce yourselves from the whole reading your reviews thing.  They are for the reading public, not for you.  Honestly, you will be happier if you can somehow get past it.  True story.

  10. Heartless_Lyn

    I can’t believe this crap is still happening.  Sadly, I think a lot of us are feeling worn down from the continuous drama.

    Pole dancing at the library. I guess we can thank FSoG for this new, edgier library? Sad reviewer is sad.

    I don’t understand how people think in this day and age that plagiarism isn’t going to be noticed.

  11. cynicalsapphire

    Piracy: Mmmm, Westley is the face of piracy. I now want nothing so much as to be a pirate. 
    Sylvia Plath: What? She HID THINGS FROM HER MOM? Who does that?

    Pole dancing: O_O Also, louse is the singular, so their crotches would itch with the fury of a thousand lice. You know you love me!
    X-Men: So the only way to focus on the women more was to take the men out of the picture? Because the men are just so much more interesting they would steal the show? Hr.
    Poetry: I totally accidentally submit other people’s poems to competitions all the time. See, I’m walking around with their poem written in my handwriting in one hand, and some envelopes addressed to the competition judges in the other, and then I trip and accidentally slip the poem in with some twenties and chocolates. Oops!
    Do Not Read: Inside joke for the win!
    Stephenie Meyer Dressed in Blood: I heard this. O_o
    Jim C. Hines: That’s going in Cover Snark in its own category of awesome.
    Plagiarism/Authors: Ugh. I hate this shit.

  12. sazbah

    Oh dear goodness. NO. MAKE IT STOP. I haven’t even READ Anna Dressed in Blood, but… if Breaking Dawn p1 is anything to judge Stepenie Meyer’s (non-existent) producerial talents by, I don’t even want to THINK about it O___o Also, I totally read that as “The Book that I loved and StephEnie MEYER was famously meh about?!” and was like… WHY IS SHE PRODUCING IT THEN? Ooooooooh.
     Ugh. It’s seems to be that time of year again. Internation Drama Week? O__o

  13. aaa

    At this time I am going to do my breakfast, once having my breakfast coming over again to read other
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

  14. aaa

    Great site. Lots of useful information here. I am
    sending it to some buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious.
    And naturally, thanks on your effort!
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

  15. aaa

    Hi my family member! I want to say that this article is awesome, great written and come with almost all important infos.

    I’d like to peer more posts like this .
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

  16. aaa

    This site certainly has all of the information I needed about this subject and didn’t
    know who to ask.
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

  17. aaa

    What’s Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads.

    I am hoping to give a contribution & assist different customers like its helped me.
    Good job.
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

  18. aaa

    I think the admin of this website is genuinely working hard in support of his site, for the reason that here every material is quality based
    aaa recently posted…aaaMy Profile

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge